Connect with us


How Exactly Does Your Biological Clock Tick?


The notion of biological age, distinct from mere chronological age, has garnered significant attention in scientific circles, offering profound insights into the aging process. Influenced by environmental factors such as diet and smoking, biological age deviates from conventional time measurements, reflecting the cumulative impact of random changes within cells. Scientists David Meyer and Professor Dr. Björn Schumacher, affiliated with the University of Cologne’s CECAD, shed light on this phenomenon in their groundbreaking study titled ‘Aging clocks based on accumulating stochastic variation,’ published in Nature Aging.

The Role of Random Changes

Professor Schumacher elucidates that aging stems from cellular damage occurring randomly across cellular structures. Their study merges the precision of aging clocks with the accumulation of random alterations within cells. As individuals age, the efficiency of cellular processes wanes, resulting in heightened random outcomes. Particularly, this randomness is prominently displayed in the buildup of random changes in DNA methylation, a process crucial for genome integrity. Despite the body’s meticulous regulation of methylation, random alterations gradually disrupt this balance, serving as a dependable gauge of age.

As one age, the regulation of cellular processes becomes less effective, leading to more random outcomes. This is especially noticeable in the accumulation of random changes in DNA methylation. Methylation involves chemical modifications that affect DNA, the fundamental building blocks of the genome. While the body tightly controls these methylation processes, random changes occur over one’s lifetime, serving as a highly accurate marker of age.

Expanding Horizons

The escalation of random variations extends beyond DNA methylation to gene activity, providing a broader avenue for the development of aging clocks. Dr. Meyer and Professor Schumacher suggest harnessing random variations in various cellular processes as potential age predictors. This innovative approach opens avenues for evaluating the effectiveness of anti-aging interventions and identifying factors that accelerate aging.

“In theory, it could be possible to take this concept further, using random variations in any cellular process to predict age,” remarks Schumacher. According to the authors, it’s crucial, above all, to determine whether such aging clocks can gauge the success of interventions that retard aging or pinpoint factors that hasten it.

Insights from Interventions



The researchers draw upon existing datasets to unveil intriguing correlations: smoking exacerbates random changes in humans, while interventions like calorie restriction in mice alleviate variations in methylation patterns. Additionally, they demonstrate the reversibility of random noise through cellular reprogramming. By converting human fibroblasts into rejuvenated stem cells, the researchers observe a notable reversal of random variation, akin to youthful cells.

Using available datasets, the scientists illustrate that smoking amplifies random changes in humans, whereas ‘anti-aging’ interventions, such as reduced calorie intake in mice, diminish variations in methylation patterns. They also demonstrate that random noise can be reversed through cellular reprogramming, transforming body cells into stem cells. Fibroblasts from human skin, when reprogrammed, exhibit rejuvenation, with the high variation indicative of cell age being reversed to the low random noise characteristic of young stem cells.

Paving the Way for Intervention


Meyer and Schumacher’s findings offer promise for novel interventions targeting the underlying causes of aging and potentially fostering cellular rejuvenation. Strategies like repairing random changes in DNA or enhancing gene expression control emerge as plausible avenues. This groundbreaking research underscores the potential for transformative interventions aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of aging and promoting longevity.

Meyer and Schumacher are hopeful that their insights into loss of regulation and the accumulation of random variations will spur new interventions capable of addressing the root cause of aging, perhaps even leading to cellular rejuvenation. Potential targets for such interventions could include repairing random changes in DNA or refining control over gene expression.

What do you think of these new insights on how the biological clock ticks? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *